The BoM’s temperature record keeping is under attack – again. What’s going on? | Temperature Check
Attributed to The Guardian. ENC is not independently verifying these facts.

Still from the source feed, not produced by ENC.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/oct/25/bom-temperature-record-keeping-under-attack-again
ENC Summary
Single-source
The Guardian is currently the only allowlisted source on the desk for this item.
Missing information
- No second independent outlet is on the desk for this item yet.
What to watch next
- Whether the original outlet issues a correction or update.
- Whether a second independent allowlisted outlet publishes on the same development.
- Whether later excerpts change the numbers or the framing.
Claim states describe the source record, not independently verified truth. Green and cyan never mean “confirmed.”
How this record changed
ENC is comparing what The Guardian published over time. This is not an independent verdict.
- First on desk · 10/24/2026, 10:00:52 PMThe BoM’s temperature record keeping is under attack – again. What’s going on? | Temperature CheckOriginal link
- Update · 10/24/2026, 10:00:52 PMThe BoM’s temperature record keeping is under attack – again. What’s going on? | Temperature CheckOriginal link
Supporting passage from source
An ‘audit’ of the Bureau of Meteorology main dataset for measuring climate change claims it contains ‘widespread errors’. It doesn’t stack up Want to get this in your inbox when it publishes? Sign up for the Clear Air Australia newsletter here Australia’s climate has warmed by more than 1.5C since 1910, according to the Bureau of Meteorology’s main long-term temperature data. If you were so motivated, you might think if you could discredit this data, then you would undermine the whole climate change story and even – perhaps – the rationale for cutting Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions. Sign up to get climate and environment editor Adam Morton’s Clear Air column as a free newsletter Continue reading...
More on Climate
Same topic on this desk, not a claim that these outlets agree. Each keeps its own original link.
Reader discussion
Comments are public only after review. Keep personal thoughts private in your saved items.
Sign in to join the discussion

