Scientists who put faith in technology less likely to take climate action
Attributed to The Guardian. ENC is not independently verifying these facts.

Still from the source feed, not produced by ENC.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/oct/07/scientists-technology-less-likely-climate-crisis-action
ENC Summary
Single-source
The Guardian is currently the only allowlisted source on the desk for this item.
Missing information
- No second independent outlet is on the desk for this item yet.
What to watch next
- Whether the original outlet issues a correction or update.
- Whether a second independent allowlisted outlet publishes on the same development.
- Whether later excerpts change the numbers or the framing.
Claim states describe the source record, not independently verified truth. Green and cyan never mean “confirmed.”
How this record changed
ENC is comparing what The Guardian published over time. This is not an independent verdict.
- First on desk · 10/7/2026, 10:00:48 AMScientists who put faith in technology less likely to take climate actionOriginal link
- Update · 10/7/2026, 10:00:48 AMScientists who put faith in technology less likely to take climate actionOriginal link
Supporting passage from source
‘Techno-optimism’ may lead to reliance on unproven solutions at expense of societal changes needed Scientists who believe technology will largely solve the problems caused by the climate crisis are less likely to engage in civic action on the issue, according to a study. The report from the London School of Economics found they are 23% less likelyto sign petitions or take part in protests than peers who doubt that technology is the answer. They are also 18% less likely to make high-impact lifestyle changes, from reducing flights to changing to a vegan or vegetarian diet. Continue reading...
More on Climate
Same topic on this desk, not a claim that these outlets agree. Each keeps its own original link.
Reader discussion
Comments are public only after review. Keep personal thoughts private in your saved items.
Sign in to join the discussion

